Introduction to Dendrochronology GEOS/ANTH/WSM/GEOG 439A/539A Fall 2018
Tuesdays and Thursdays, 9:30 – 10:45
Associate Professor Valerie Trouet (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Professor David Frank (email@example.com)
Regents' Professor Malcolm Hughes (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Bannister Tree-Ring Building Rm 320 (Trouet)
Rm 421 (Hughes)
Trouet: Thursdays, 2:00–4:00pm or after appointment.
Nick Kessler (email@example.com)
In this course students will learn the scientific basis, techniques, and applications of dendrochronology. We will review the historical development and key discoveries of the field. We will study the biological basis of tree-ring research and the central principles of dendrochronology. After studying fundamental concepts students will learn about applications of dendrochronology in different disciplines via lectures and discussions with leading dendrochronologists at the Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research. During intensive, weekly laboratory sessions and a weekend field trip students will learn the practical skills of specimen collection, preparation, observation, and the most important method and principle of dendrochronology — crossdating. At the end of the course, students will be able to collect tree-ring samples, prepare and date the samples, and build a local chronology. Finally, students will be able to evaluate dendrochronological analyses, and interpret their own data for specific research issues.
There is no required textbook for the course.
Required readings may be downloaded as Adobe Acrobat pdf files at a password protected site at: https://www.ltrr.arizona.edu/introdendro/Readings/.
The username and password for this site will be provided by the instructors.
Note that a full listing of the readings is at the bottom of this page. If you are unable to access the readings, tell one of the instructors.
Readings should be completed before the class on that particular topic. It would also be a good idea for all students to browse the LTRR web site at https://ltrr.arizona.edu, and especially the link to online bibliography, software and other dendrochronology information resources at https://ltrr.arizona.edu/resources.
Lab is required for the course and will meet once a week for approximately 3 hours. The Lab constitutes a very important part of the course and of your grade. Topics covered in the lab include the practical aspects of crossdating, sample preparation and mounting, chronology building and interpretation, and the interpretation of different types of dendrochronological samples.
A detailed Lab syllabus is posted here: Lab Schedule 2018.
A guide to Lab exercises and sample sets, and a suggested pace of work is posted here: Lab Exercises 2018.
Mandatory Field Trip
There will be two mandatory one-day field trips in September to conduct dendrochronological sampling and to observe and learn about classic dendrochronology research topics and areas. Additional information about the field trip will be discussed in class. Methods demonstrated on the field trip will include site and tree selection criteria, increment coring techniques, and other field procedures in a problem-oriented context.
Evaluation and Grading
Four homework exercises are required for undergraduate students (see below for topics and due dates), and are designed to require students to read and evaluate relevant literature. For undergraduate students, there will be two exams, a mid-term and a final exam, covering the lecture materials. Graduate students will only take the mid-term exam. There will also be a practical Lab exam for all students covering the information and skills learned in the Lab. Finally, graduate students are required to (a) submit both electronically and as hard copy one annotated bibliography of the dendrochronological literature that includes at least 10 references-(see schedule for due dates), and (b) conduct, report, and present a research project specific to their area of interest (see below). The result should be in the form of a publishable paper or section of a thesis, dissertation, or proposal, and is due on the last regular day of class. Topics must be agreed with the instructors prior to submission.
|Undergraduate students||Graduate students|
|Homework 1–4 (25 × 4)||100 points||Annotated bibliography||100 points|
|Mid-term Exam||200 points||Mid-term Exam||200 points|
|Final Exam||250 points||-||-|
|Laboratory Exam||70 points||Laboratory Exam||70 points|
|Lab Exercises||180 points||Lab Exercises||180 points|
|-||-||Graduate Paper||200 points|
|-||-||Graduate Paper presentation||50 points|
|Undergraduate TOTAL||800 points||Graduate TOTAL||800 points|
|Undergraduate grades||Graduate grades|
|A||720 points||A||720 points|
|B||640 points||B||640 points|
|C||540 points||C||540 points|
|D||460 points||D||460 points|
|E||< 460 points||E||< 460 points|
- Mid-Term and Final Exams are a combination of questions requiring short answers (a word, phrase or single sentence), and questions requiring longer answers (a paragraph or more). No incompletes will be given in this course, except under extraordinary circumstances.
- There is no extra credit.
|Tu Aug 21||-||Introduction, Course Structure, Lab Intro, LTRR Tour|
|Th Aug 23||-||Introduction to Dendrochronology|
|Tu Aug 28||Stokes and Smiley 1968, Lamarche and Harlan 1973||cross-dating|
|Th Aug 30||Bowyer et al., CH 1||Biological basis of annual ring formation|
|Tu Sep 4||Moser et al (2011)||High-resolution investigations|
|Th Sep 6||Bowyer et al., CH 3- 6||wood anatomy, structure, and function|
|Tu Sep 11||Fritts et al. 1965||Site and tree selection|
|Th Sep 13||Hughes 2011||chronology building: signal extraction|
|Tu Sep 18||Hughes et al. 2011, Trouet et al. 2010||chronology building: networks|
|Th Sep 20||Trouet et al. 2012a||chronology building: what can you measure?|
|Tu Sep 25||Black et al. 2005, Black et al. 2014||Sclerochronology (Dr. Bryan Black)|
|Th Sep 27||Leavitt 2010||Isotopes in dendrochronology (Dr. Steve Leavitt)|
|Tu Oct 2||-||Archives, data management (Dr. Peter Brewer)|
|Th Oct 4||-||Review session for midterm|
|Tu Oct 9||-||Mid-Term Exam|
|Th Oct 11||Rozendaal and Zuidema 2011; Trouet et al 2012b||Dendrochronology in the Tropics (Dr. Kevin Anchukaitis)|
|Tu Oct 16||Dean et al. 1996, Towner 2002||Southwestern dendroarcheology (Dr. Ron Towner)|
|Th Oct 18||Haneca et al. 2009||European dendroarcheology (Dr. Charlotte Pearson)|
|Tu Oct 23||Hughes and Brown, 1992; Hughes and Funkhouser 2003; Salzer et al, 2013||Charismatic paleoflora - working with trees that have lived for millennia (Dr. Malcolm Hughes)|
|Th Oct 25||Falk et al. 2011, Kipfmueller and Swetnam 2001||Fire Ecology (Dr. Don Falk)|
|Tu Oct 30||O'Connor et al. 2015, Flower et al. 2014||Dendro-entomology (Dr. Ann Lynch)|
|Th Nov 1||Babst et al. 2014||Tree rings in the carbon cycle (Dr. Soumaya Belmecheri)|
|Tu Nov 6||Fritts et al.1979, Stahle and Cleaveland 1992, Jacoby and D’Arrigo 1989||Dendroclimatology (Dr. David Frank)|
|Th Nov 8||Rice et al. 2009; Woodhouse and Lukas 2006||Dendrohydrology (Dr. Connie Woodhouse)|
|Tu Nov 13||Meko and Woodhouse 2011||Dendrohydrology (Dr. David Meko)|
|Th Nov 15||Babst et al. (2018)||Demographics and dendrochronology (Dr. Margaret Evans)|
|Tu Nov 20||Diaz and Trouet 2014, Pederson et al. 2014||Human-environment interactions (Dr. Kevin Anchukaitis)|
|Th Nov 22||-||No class — Thanksgiving|
|Tu Nov 27||-||Graduate students present term paper to whole class|
|Th Nov 29||prior lectures and readings||Review session for Final (all undergraduate students attend)|
|Tu Dec 4||-||FINAL EXAM 9.30–11.30am|
|Tu Dec 4||-||Lab final exam (1pm–4pm)|
|September 18||Homework #1 due (Undergrad students)|
|September 27||Grad paper provisional topic due|
|October 9||Mid-Term Exam (in class)|
|October 18||Homework #2 due (Undergrad students)|
|October 18||Annotated Bibliography due (Grad students)|
|November 1||Homework #3 due (Undergrad students)|
|November 20||Homework #4 due (Undergrad students)|
|November 27||Grad Student paper due and presentations|
|December 4, 1–4pm||Lab Practical Final Exam|
|December 4, 9:30–11:30am||Final Exam|
Undergraduate Homework Assignments
These assignments consist of a 1-page summary of an article (not a web page!) pertaining to dendrochronology. The summary should include (a) the full reference of the article (i.e. how & where do I find it), (b) a summary of the main points of the work, and (c) a critical evaluation of the work (i.e. is it worth reading, and why?). The assignments must be submitted electronically to Professor Trouet at: firstname.lastname@example.org and must have the word “Assignment_IntroDendro” as the first words in the subject field.
Keep in mind that the quality and clarity of your writing, and spelling, punctuation, and grammar count! Spell-check, grammar-check, and proof-read your summaries before submitting them.
Find, summarize and evaluate a peer-reviewed paper or part of a book containing information on site selection, chronology building, or climatic signals in dendrochronology. 25 points.
Find, summarize and evaluate a peer-reviewed paper or part of a book containing information on an application of dendrochronology in archeology. 25 points.
Find, summarize and evaluate a peer-reviewed paper or part of a book containing information on an application of dendrochronology in ecology. 25 points.
Find, summarize and evaluate a peer-reviewed paper or part of a book containing information on an application of dendrochronology in climatology or hydrology. 25 points.
The format is:
Nesvetajlo, V.D., Consequences of the Tunguska catastrophe: dendrochronoindication inference Planet. Space Sci., 1998, 46 (2/3): 155–161.
An explosion or impact by an unknown, large body occurred at about 6 to 8 km. elevation above the region of Tunguska in east-central Siberia on June 30, 1908. This resulted in damage for 60-80 km around an epicenter, with many millions of trees being blown down. The author visited the epicenter in 1990 and took increment cores from some of the trees left standing at the epicenter. He reports an attempt to infer details of the event from the nature of the rings formed in these trees in 1908 and subsequent years. His main findings were???. The data provided only partially support these conclusions because?... The importance of these results is?... The study could be extended and improved if the following were done??... This is an informative and readable paper, based on careful work, although I found the author's interpretation of his observations to be somewhat unconvincing. Even so, he has laid the groundwork for future studies that could be informative.
Graduate Student Annotated Biblography
Graduate students are required to prepare an annotated bibliography of scientific literature relating to dendrochronology and specifically to the topic of their graduate paper. At least 10 separate papers, book chapters, reports, monographs, etc. must be included. The required class readings can be included in this bibliography, but they do not count toward the minimum 10 papers. In addition to a full citation for the work, a succinct summary of the most important points of the paper should be provided, along with your own assessment and judgement of the findings and values of the paper. These summary statements should not simply be condensed versions of the paper's abstract, but should clearly show your own evaluation of the paper.
Graduate Student Papers
The Graduate Student Paper should be a 10–15 page report (minimum type size 11 point, double spaced, 1 inch margins) on some original research, a pertinent literature review, or a proposal soliciting funding for a specific project. Depending on the type of project you choose, your paper should include (at a minimum) introduction, background research/discussion of the problem, field and lab methods, results, discussion, conclusion, and references cited sections. (A literature review is somewhat different—see me if you have questions).
The paper should be formatted in the style used by the major journal in your field (i.e. American Antiquity for archaeologists, The Holocene or International Journal of Climatology for paleoclimatologists, etc.). References, figures, and tables are included in the page limit. Figures and tables should be legible, but I do not require that they be publication quality. The paper will be assessed both in terms of its content and in terms of the quality of the writing and presentation. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, style, and layout all count!
I encourage you to write something that fits precisely the requirements of this class, but that also serves some other purpose, for example a chapter of your thesis or dissertation, a paper for publication, or a proposal. This economy of effort, however, does not extend to using the same paper for two or more classes!
Attendance and Rules of Conduct
- Students are expected to adhere to the ABOR code of conduct and the UA Code of Academic Integrity. (Click on highlighted text to see further information on these rules and policies.)
- Attendance at all lectures and lab sessions is important and is expected, but is not included in grade calculation. All holidays or special events observed by organized religions will be honored for those students who show affiliation with that particular religion.
- Absences pre-approved by the UA Dean of Students (or Dean's designee) will be honored. Excessive absences may be grounds for dropping a student from the course. It is, however, the student's responsibility to drop the course officially; failure to do so will result in a grade of E or I, at the instructor's discretion.
- If you must arrive late or leave early (something not encouraged), please do so quietly; noisy entrants will be required to leave immediately.
- Cell phone usage, web browsing or reading of materials unrelated to the lecture or lab (e.g., newspapers, magazines, etc.) are disruptive, and are prohibited in class. Students who exhibit disruptive behavior may be administratively dropped from the course at the Instructor's discretion.
- Discrimination on the basis or race, religion, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, physical disability is prohibited by UA and other policies. Violence will not be tolerated in the classroom. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, verbal, written, or internet activities. Anyone observed using any racist or derogatory language, writing offensive materials, or downloading pornography or other objectionable materials will be required to leave the class and may be administratively dropped from the course at the Instructor's discretion.
- Cheating will not be tolerated and is grounds for expulsion from the course; cheating includes, but is not limited to: copying work of others during exams or homework; turning in any work of others as your own, including work of students from past semesters; plagiarism on papers. The University Library provides definitions and discussion of plagiarism.
- Students found cheating on any assigned work will receive a score of 0 for that assignment and will be reported to the Dean of Students. A second violation is grounds for expulsion from the course.
- In compliance with Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990), students who require special assistance will be suitably accommodated. Students must be registered with the University and a minimum of 5 days notice for such accommodations is requested.
- If the schedule conflicts with major religious observances, please let the professor know.
- If English is not your native language and you believe that you must use a translation dictionary during exams, please contact the professor.
- Students requiring accommodation in testing or note taking: Please notify the professor and provide the Disability Resource Center letter within the first few days of the course.
- Student athletes and others who need signatures periodically: Please notify the professor that you'll be needing signatures generally, and please alert the professor before a particular signing period is due so that your most up-to-date grade can be calculated.
- Honors College students: An Honors Contract is allowable. See the instructor to arrange those details.
Babst et al. (2014) A tree-ring perspective on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Oecologia DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-3031-6
Babst et al. (2018) When tree rings go global: Challenges and opportunities for retro- and prospective insight. Quaternary Science Reviews 197, 1–20.
Black, BA, GW Boehlert, MM Yoklavich (2005) Using tree-ring crossdating techniques to validate annual growth increments in long-lived fishes Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62 (10), 2277–2284
Black, BA, WJ Sydeman, DC Frank, D Griffin, DW Stahle, M García-Reyes, et al. (2014) Six centuries of variability and extremes in a coupled marine-terrestrial ecosystem. Science 345 (6203), 1498–1502
Bowyer, J.L., Shmulsky, R. and Haygreen, J.G. (2007) Forest Products and Wood Science: An Introduction. See schedule for details.
Dean, J.S., M.C. Slaughter and D.O. Bowden (1996). Desert dendrochronology: tree-ring dating prehistoric sites in the Tucson Basin. Kiva 62, 7 – 26.
Diaz and Trouet (2014) Some Perspectives on Societal Impacts of Past Climatic Changes. History Compass doi:10.1111/hic3.12140
Falk et al. (2011) Multi-scale controls of historical forest-fire regimes: new insights from fire-scar networks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment doi:10.1890/100052
Fritts, H.C. (1976). Tree Rings and Climate. Academic Press, London. Pages 55 – 68.
Fritts, H.C., G.R. Lofgren and G.A. Gordon (1979) Variations in climate since 1602 as reconstructed from tree rings. Quaternary Research 12, 18 – 46.
Fritts, H.F., D.G. Smith, J.W. Cardis and C.A. Budelsky (1965). Tree-ring characteristics along a vegetation gradient in Northern Arizona.Ecology 46, 393–401.3.
Haneca et al. (2009) Oaks, tree rings and wooden cultural heritage: a review of the main characteristics and applications of oak dendrochronology in Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 36:1–11.
Hughes, M.K. (2011) Dendroclimatology in high-resolution paleoclimatology. IN M.K. Hughes et al. (eds.), Dendroclimatology, Progress and Prospects. Springer, Berlin, pp. 17 – 34.
Jacoby, G.C., P.R. Sheppard and K.E. Sieh (1988). Irregular recurrence of large earthquakes along the San Adreas Fault: Evidence from trees. Science 241:196–199.
Kipfmueller, K. F. and T. W. Swetnam (2001) Using dendrochronology to reconstruct the history of ecosystems. Chapter 8, pages 199–228, In D. Egan and E. A. Howell eds., Techniques for Discovering Historic Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington.
LaMarche, Jr., V.C., and T.P. Harlan (1973). Accuracy of tree-ring dating of bristlecone pine for calibration of the radiocarbon time scale. Journal of Geophysical Research 78, 8849 – 8857.
Leavitt, S.W. (2010). Tree-ring C-H-O isotope variability and sampling. Science of the Total Environment in press
McCarroll, D, and N.J. Loader. (2004) Stable isotopes in tree rings. Quaternary Science Reviews 23:771–801.
Meko, D.M. (2006) Tree ring inferences on water-level fluctuations of Lake Athabasca. Canadian Water Resources Journal 31(4):1–20.
Meko, D.M. and Woodhouse, C. (2011) Application of streamflow reconstruction to water resources management. IN M.K. Hughes et al. (eds.), Dendroclimatology, Progress and Prospects. Springer, Berlin, pp. 231 – 261.
Moser, L. et al., (2011) Timing and duration of European larch growing season along altitudinal gradients in the Swiss Alps. Tree Physiology 30: 225–233.
Pederson et al. (2014) Pluvials, droughts, the Mongol Empire, and modern Mongolia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 4375–4379.
Rice, J.L. et al. (2009) Science and decision making: water management and tree-ring data in the Western United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45: 1248–1259.
Rozendaal, D.M.A. and Zuidema, P.A. (2011) Dendroecology in the tropics: a review. Trees 25: 3–16.
Salzer, M.W., Hughes, M.K., Bunn, A.G. and Kipfmueller, K.F. (2009) Recent unprecedented tree-ring growth in bristleone pine at the highest elevations and possible causes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 20348–20353.
Stahle, D. W. and M.K. Cleaveland (1992) Reconstruction and analysis of spring rainfall over the southeastern U.S. for the past 1000 years. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 73, 1947 – 1961.
Stokes, M.A., and T. L. Smiley (1968). An Introduction to Tree-Ring Dating, University of Arizona Press, Tucson. (Reprinted 1995). Pages xi – xiii, xv – xvii, 3 – 20.
Towner, R.H. (2002) Archeological Dendrochronology in the Southwestern United States. Evolutionary Anthropology 11: 68–84.
Trouet V, Taylor AH, Wahl ER, Skinner CN, Stephens SL (2010) Fire-climate interactions in the American West since 1400 CE. Geophysical Research Letters DOI:10.1029/2009GL041695
Trouet V, Panayotov M, Ivanova A, Frank DC (2012b) A pan-European summer teleconnection mode revealed by a new temperature reconstruction from the northeastern Mediterranean (1868–2008). The Holocene DOI: 10.1177/0959683611434225
Trouet et al. (2012b) Cambial growth season of brevi-deciduous Brachystegia spiciformis trees from South Central Africa restricted to four months. PLoS ONE 7(10): e47364.
Woodhouse, C.A., S.T. Gray, and D.M. Meko (2006) Updated streamflow reconstructions for the Colorado River. Water Resources Research 42, W05415, doi:10.1029/2005WR004455.
Yamaguchi, D. K. and D.B. Lawrence (1993) Tree-ring evidence for 1842 – 1843 eruptive activity at the Goat Rocks dome, Mount St. Helens, Washington. Bulletin of Volcanology 55, 264 – 272.
Information contained in this course syllabus, other than the grade, absence and other UA policies, may be subject to change with reasonable advance notice, as deemed appropriate by the instructor.