 |
Main
mound at the University Indian Ruin from the southeast during
1940 excavations, a Civilian Conservation Corps project directed
by Julian Hayden. The Santa Catalina Mountains are visible in the
background. (Photo Credit: Emil W. Haury, Arizona State Museum,
University of Arizona) |
Tree-Ring Dates for Charcoal from Ancient Indian
Ruin Bolster Tucson Basin Archaeology
By Lori Stiles
December 04, 2003
University of Arizona tree-ring scientists
have used charcoal collected between 1930 and 1940 to date a
Hohokam Indian site called University Indian Ruin. The site is
near Sabino Canyon and Tanque Verde Roads, seven miles from
downtown Tucson.
Dating the prehistoric site is a major breakthrough in desert
archaeology. University Indian Ruin is only the fourth
prehistoric desert site dated by tree-rings, and the first firmly
placed in the Tucson Late Classic phase.
Charcoal dating shows that Hohokam lived at University Indian
Ruin during or shortly after the winter of A.D. 1371 and until
after A.D. 1375, said UA Tree-Ring Lab archaeological Research
Specialist David J. Street and UA dendrochronology Professor
Jeffrey S. Dean.
That's 125 years after Hohokam were known to have occupied three
other tree-ring dated sites near Tucson. The other sites are
Gibbon Springs, Whiptail Ruin, and Marana Mound.
University Indian Ruin is a 656-by-427-foot area containing at
least three separate room blocks and a platform mound. UA
archaeologists partially excavated the site between 1930 and
1940. Wood samples collected at the site were numbered and
archived at Tree-Ring Lab during the 1960s.

Main
mound at the University Indian Ruin from the southeast during
1940 excavations, a Civilian Conservation Corps project directed
by Julian Hayden. The Santa Catalina Mountains are visible in the
background. (Photo Credit: Emil W. Haury, Arizona State Museum,
UA) |
Tree-ring scientists weren't able to date the
samples then, but they now have developed better local tree-ring
chronologies and better dating techniques.
In October, Street reanalyzed 47 tree-ring samples collected at
the ruin about 60 years ago, and was able to date eight charcoal
pieces.
"These dates provide the first absolute and independent dating
controls that are precise enough to provide a firm anchor in time
for this site," Street said.
The Hohokam (ho-ho-kam), ancestors of today's Pima and Tohono
O'odham people, built villages in the Tucson Basin from about
A.D. 300 A.D. to A.D. 1500.
Archaeologists can place the sites within a 50- to 200-year
range through radiocarbon dating and by studying ceramics and
architectural styles. But only tree-ring dates are accurate
enough to tie occupation to a calendar year.
Dating Tucson-Basin tree rings has been difficult because desert
trees often don't grow a single ring each year as do Southwestern
trees living at higher elevations. Southern Arizona's climate
produces trees that grow one or more false rings annually, or
sometimes miss rings altogether, as they cope with an arid
climate.
A strong local tree-ring chronology is vital to dating
short-lived and difficult trees, Street said. The samples dated
at University Indian Ruin had 35 to 65 rings and could be dated
only because they overlapped in time and shared a strong climate
signal. All the samples were from young trees — some with
only 5 to 20 rings — because the Hohokam cut young trees in
the lower Santa Catalina Mountains.

It
doesn't look like much, but the small piece of charcoal (left)
yielded some of the best tree-ring dates from University Indian
Ruin. |
Arizona State Museum archaeologists Paul Fish
and Suzanne Fish plan to excavate University Indian Ruin in 2005
during an anthropology department archaeological field
school.
"The new tree-ring dates are exciting," Paul Fish said. "The
very late tree-ring dates suggest that University Indian Ruin
occupation may extend into the 15th century. One of our research
objectives is to learn more about the final phase of the Hohokam,
and to learn more precisely when it ends."
Some archaeologists argue that Hohokam culture vanished before
Europeans came to southern Arizona. But others think Hohokam were
still in the Tucson Basin, Suzanne Fish said. New excavations at
University Indian Ruin might confirm contact between the Hohokam
and Spanish explorers, she said.
Tree-ring dates also will give archaeologists clues to migration
within the Tucson Basin, Paul Fish said. "Some sites appear to
have been abandoned after A.D. 1300, while others continued to be
occupied and probably even grew in population."
Until recently, archaeologists weren't interested in collecting
wood samples in the Tucson Basin and surrounding areas because
they believed dating them wasn't possible or not worth the
effort, Street and Dean explained. This has left tree-ring
scientists with too few samples now that chances of dating desert
wood have increased dramatically.
During the past decade, the UA Tree-Ring Lab has made
significant strides in dating southern Arizona's prehistoric wood
samples, and now need more Tucson-Basin specimens to strengthen
the local tree-ring chronology.
The dating breakthrough resulted from prolonged, steady
efforts.
First, tree-ring scientists dated historic Tucson structures,
proving that if they have enough good material and a long
chronology they can date prehistoric desert wood.
Next, in the mid 1990s, Dean and others reviewed 1,664
previously collected samples, extracting 21 dates from
prehistoric Sonoran desert sites for the first time. They dated
samples from the Gibbon Springs and Whiptail Ruin sites (both
near the University Indian Ruin), and from the Marana Mound site.
The three sites were simultaneously occupied and abandoned by
A.D. 1250.

Street
(left) and Wright review collected wood that they hope will
strengthen the Santa Catalinas tree-ring chronology. |
Then in the late 1990s, Christopher Baisan
strengthened a tree-ring chronology compiled by Henri
Grissino-Mayer from southeastern Arizona's Pinaleno Mountains.
This chronology now extends back to A.D. 882, and Street used it
to date University Indian Ruin.
In another development, Ed Wright, a Tree-Ring Lab student who
since has completed his doctorate, led wood-collecting
expeditions to the Santa Catalina Mountains in the 1990s. Street
is now analyzing these samples and attempting to extend and
strengthen the Santa Catalina tree-ring chronology. If he
succeeds, the chronology may help date more Hohokam sites.
"At the moment, this chronology is deep back to about 1400, just
a little after where we need it to be," Street said. "Dating this
material is still extremely difficult, but we expect further
success at dating these sites in the future," Street added.
Copyright 2004 by
Arizona Board of Regents
|